Brutally exposed for what readily qualifies for a crime—i.e., inciting violence at Trump’s rallies—the Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton’s campaign has again been heavily favored by liberal media that did not report on the video evidence made public in international and social media.
British paper Daily Mail published the story 2 days ago revealing the video evidence provided by conservative activists showing Clinton campaign operative Robert Creamer planning violence at Trump’s rallies and paying mentally ill people to disrupt Republican side’s events. Caught red-handed and exposed, Creamer reportedly “stepped back” and is not serving on his role though denying that he did anything wrong—the usual habit of openly lying that characterizes Democratic party’s current politics.
Donald Trump commented on this incident in yesterday’s events and pointed to the rigged nature of elections as exposed in the video.
Mainstream—aka lamestream—media in the US has assumed a notable blackout on the issue of Creamer’s crime. Some liberal mainstream propaganda publications, like the New York Times, published the story with a politically biased leaning, attempting to prove Creamer innocent and the video not credible. And in doing so once more they provided evidence of their corruption and policy of lying.
In a Word Matters posting, earlier this year, I compared Trump “protesters” to Taliban in Pakistan who, in similar manner, wouldn’t let the secular side run its political campaign, as they caused cancellation of Trump’s Chicago rally.
One wonders if this is all happening in broad daylight in America, what could you expect from the third world? Or has Obama’s America become a third world? In either case, the need for trump as US president is underscored as media and government agencies stand with the corruption and abuse of the Clintons.
